Word from Mexico

MexicoAlthough Vital Trivia has been mainly concerned with hydrocarbon depletion from a UK perspective, as we really do have ringside seats for the main attraction with our indigenous oil, gas and coal extraction rates simultaneously collapsing as reserves deplete and our nuclear power stations reaching the end of their lives, today we turn our attention to Mexico.

Mexico is little talked about but a major player in the global peak oil game. The US and Mexico have a difficult relationship. The 3,141km land border is virtually unguarded with the interesting statistic of not only being the longest boundary between a first and third world country but also divides the largest income gap between any two contiguous countries. This might go someway to explaining the 8 million Mexicans in the US, 4.8 million there illegally.

Turning to oil, at approximately 3.8 million barrels per day (mbpd) Mexico is the world’s fifth largest oil producer after Russia (9.7), Saudi Arabia (9.5) US (7.5, less hurricane damage!) and Iran (3.9). Proximity to the worlds most oil hungry country sees much of this oil flowing to the US, Mexico is America’s second largest source of imported oil after Canada importing some 1.6mbpd. Mexico’s total extraction rate of 3.8mbpd minus their domestic consumption of 2mbpd (and rising) shows that this export to the US is almost 90% of Mexican export capacity.

The jewel in the Mexican crown is the super giant oil field, Cantarell. Discovered in 1976 and supporting extraction rates of just over 2mbpd makes Cantarell the second fastest flowing oil filed in the world after the Saudi field Ghawar.

Recent comment from a senior engineer at Pemex, the Mexican national oil company, suggests Cantarell is at the end of its life and about to experience a massive collapse in flow rate. This extract is from an interview obtained by Adam Porter of www.oilcast.com. The MP3 audio file of the this oilcast is available here.

The original volume of the field was estimated at 33 billion barrels, but the recoverable oil was some 16 billion. We have frantically pumped about 11 billion barrels throughout the life of the field. It is completing its natural cycle. Cantarell is a carbonated field, which in the future could show a deep decline of up to a 15 percent annually. If we factor in more efficient pumping, we could see an even higher depletion rate. That is without mentioning that other fields, like for instance Abkatun, is already showing a twenty percent annual decline for more than 5 years now.

The news here isn’t that Cantarell is peaking, that has been expected for some time but the rate of decline is extreme. It does seem plausible though, to have managed to extract 68% of a reservoirs ultimate recoverable reserve before the flow rate entered terminal decline is testament to the skilled Pemex engineers but it also guarantees a very rapid decline. That rate would remove over half a million barrels per day in two years and almost a million barrels per day in four. The graph shows just the effect of Cantarell peaking, optimistically assuming that declines from other fields can be compensated for with new projects.

Cantarell

Mexico can’t replace that kind of decline which guarantees that America’s second largest oil supplier is peaking. Mexico’s decline is really America’s problem; they are the country left looking elsewhere for another million barrels per day over the next few years. Wherever they look however they are going to see the same thing, peaking flow rates and desperate buyers.

This post was written by Chris Vernon

This entry was posted on Saturday, December 3rd, 2005 at 11:27 am and is filed under Hydrocarbon Depletion. You can follow any responses to this entry through the RSS 2.0 feed. You can leave a response, or trackback from your own site.

4 Responses to “Word from Mexico”

  1. uday Says:

    good eyes! little did I know about mexico’s contribution to american oil consumption before I read this article!

  2. JD Says:

    Hi Chris,

    The following is the data on Mexico from the Koppelaar report. It appears that the decline will be attenuated by new fields, and Type III decline will be about 3 to 6% per year in the near term.

    Mexico production forecast
    2004: 3789
    1st qtr 2005: 3825
    End 2005: 3663
    End 2006: 3428
    End 2007: 3316
    End 2008: 3324
    End 2009: 3218

    On Mexico
    “In 2004 oil production was 3.38 mb/d and NGL production was 442.000
    b/d, giving a total liquids production of 3.83 mb/d. An annual decline
    rate of 10% over 388.000 b/d of 2004 oil production has been added. An
    annual decline rate of 12% over 2.14 mb/d of 2004 oil production
    (Cantarell) has been added. An annual decline rate of 3% over 548.000
    b/d of 2004 oil production has been added. NGL production was assumed
    to remain stable. On top of this a total of 850.000 mb/d from 2
    projects has been added.

    Specific information: “According to then Exploration and Production
    Director Ramirez Corzo, Cantarell’s production should remain stable
    until 2006, but would decline by 14% per year after that. However,
    Ramirez Corzo recently stated on November 2, 2004 that “Our best
    estimate is that Cantarell will start to decline toward the middle of
    next year [2005],” raising the possibility that Cantarell’s decline
    could come sooner than originally had been thought.”
    http://www.peakoil.nl/images/ponlreport.pdf

  3. Chris (Admin) Says:

    My graph assumes that Cantarell will decline rapidly and declines in other fields will be substituted for by new projects. The Koppelaar numbers and my graph aren’t actually all that different. It all comes down to that 850kb/d that Koppelaar expects from new projects.

    From the Oil Cast interview we have:
    One has to realize that in order to replace the capacity of Cantarell with these new fields, (none of which exceeds 200 million barrels) we would need some 20 new fields. Right now we have only discovered three.

    Suggesting that new fields are hardly going scratch the surface of the Cantarell decline and would do well just to substitute for non-Cantarell decline. We also have this statement:
    The fifth module of the nitrogen plant, located in Atasta, off the Campeche shore, will be used in the pressure maintenance of the field. It is probable that Ku will reach some 800,000 barrels at its maximum. With this production, the Cantarell decline will be mitigated a little bit. But the problem with Ku is its extra heavy oil.

    I don’t know what Ku is producing today but it looks like it can increase by a few hundred thousand barrels - but it’s extra heavy. Similar to the oil the Saudi’s can’t give away.

    I think the 850kb/d is just a little bit optimistic, dropping it to 600kb/d would just about bring it in line with my graph.

  4. BOG Says:

    Thisis why I have been investing in companies like FDG,RTK andSYNM

Leave a Reply